Re: [PATCH] ALS-110 opl3 and mpu401 under 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-17 Thread Mark Hindley
I conceed. The opl3 pnp patch still stands. I will have to look again at why the sb driver wasn't finding the mpu. Sigh Mark Mark Hindley Director of the Music Centre University of St Andrews 01334 462226/7 http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/services/music - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: [PATCH] ALS-110 opl3 and mpu401 under 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-17 Thread Alan Cox
> So why does the kernel command-line uart401=1 make a builtin uart401 > driver look for the mpu at 0x1 rather than persuade the sb driver to to do > a pnp lookup for it? Because the __setup string for it is uart401, the sb is sb=... > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri

Re: [PATCH] ALS-110 opl3 and mpu401 under 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-17 Thread Mark Hindley
>It changes the command line properties people already use. It also cannot be >neccessary since 'uart401' is static. So why does the kernel command-line uart401=1 make a builtin uart401 driver look for the mpu at 0x1 rather than persuade the sb driver to to do a pnp lookup for it? Mark Hindley

Re: [PATCH] ALS-110 opl3 and mpu401 under 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-17 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> 2) The other relates to the uart401 detection. If you build the sb driver > into the kernel and then pass the commandline uart401=1 this is interpreted > as the io parameter for the uart401 module not a command for the sb driver. Of course. Module parameters are _not_ relevant for builtin driv

Re: [PATCH] ALS-110 opl3 and mpu401 under 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-17 Thread Alan Cox
> 2) The other relates to the uart401 detection. If you build the sb driver > into the kernel and then pass the commandline uart401=1 this is interpreted > as the io parameter for the uart401 module not a command for the sb driver. > I have renamed the uart401 detection command to uart401probe. Ob