On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Monday, March 07, 2016 07:50:57 PM Len Brown wrote:
>> > But with Broadwell-EP processor (E5-2687W v4) the CPU will not enter turbo
>> > modes if this value is not set to performance
>>
>> BDX-EP supports HWP.
>> Are these failing machin
On Monday, March 07, 2016 07:50:57 PM Len Brown wrote:
> > But with Broadwell-EP processor (E5-2687W v4) the CPU will not enter turbo
> > modes if this value is not set to performance
>
> BDX-EP supports HWP.
> Are these failing machines running in HWP mode?
>
> (On BDX-EP, and only on BDX-EP, EP
> But with Broadwell-EP processor (E5-2687W v4) the CPU will not enter turbo
> modes
> if this value is not set to performance
BDX-EP supports HWP.
Are these failing machines running in HWP mode?
(On BDX-EP, and only on BDX-EP, EPB acts to set the BIAS for HWP,
because that processor doesn't ye
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 02, 2016 01:26:18 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 01, 2016 01:17:37 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
>> > > > if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EPB))z
>> > > >
>> > > > return;
>> > > >
On Wednesday, March 02, 2016 01:26:18 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 01, 2016 01:17:37 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > > if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EPB))z
> > > >
> > > > return;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -387,10 +391,8 @@ static void init_intel_energy_
On Tuesday, March 01, 2016 01:17:37 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Saturday, February 27, 2016 12:15:47 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, February 26, 2016 05:38:00 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > The assumption that BIOSes never want to have this register being set to
> > > full perform
On Saturday, February 27, 2016 12:15:47 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 26, 2016 05:38:00 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > The assumption that BIOSes never want to have this register being set to
> > full performance (zero) is wrong.
> >
> > While wrongly overruling this BIOS setti
On Friday, February 26, 2016 05:38:00 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
> The assumption that BIOSes never want to have this register being set to
> full performance (zero) is wrong.
>
> While wrongly overruling this BIOS setting and set it from performance
> to normal did not hurt that much, because nob
This in fact is a re-send, including x86 maintainers.
Even this is a PM (Power Management) issue, the code is in the
x86 architecture paths.
>From last submit:
> > Patch is against latest linux-pm kernel.
> > Rafael: Can you queue this one up, please.
> Well, I'm not an x86 arch maintainer.
> Can
9 matches
Mail list logo
