Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version

2020-08-26 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 8:53 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Thanks for the text - a first good step. > > Do you plan checks in the source-code - in the future (see [1] where I > played a bit)? Oh, I forgot! Good idea, will add a check to compiler-clang.h. > Arch-specific supported LLVM toolchain vers

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version

2020-08-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:26 AM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote: > > Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start > small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now. > > We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over >

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version

2020-08-26 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start > small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now. > > We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over > time. Also, not

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version

2020-08-26 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start > small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now. > > We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over > time. Also, not

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version

2020-08-25 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
On 8/25/20 17:51, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >> Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start >> small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now. >> >> We can probably widen the support w

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version

2020-08-25 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:51:31 -0700 Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > +Clang/LLVM (optional) 10.0.1 clang --version > > Maybe it is worth making the "(optional)" a footnote like Sphinx? Seems > to just kind of stick out to me but I do not have a strong opinion > unless others do. Let's n

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version

2020-08-25 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start > small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now. > > We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over > time. Also, not