Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-23 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/17/2013 08:34:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: On 13-07-16 01:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 > Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. >> Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means upda

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-17 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On 13-07-16 01:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 > Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. >> Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating >> some dates and statistics. > > Ccing the au

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-16 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker wrote: > The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. > Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating > some dates and statistics. Ccing the author of the document never hurts :) I actually went throu

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process] On 16/07/2013 (Tue 13:50) Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker > wrote: > > > > On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 19:34 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: [...] > Some kernels are designated "long term" kernels; they will receive support > for a longer period. As of this writing, the current long term kernels > and their maintainers are: > > - 2.6.27 Willy Tarreau (Deep-fr

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread on linux-next > where we were indicating that people shouldn't rebase linux-next content > on a whim, and that new devel (vs. bugfix) content shouldn't appear in > the

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process] On 16/07/2013 (Tue 10:15) Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Good work! > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker > wrote: > > > > Linux-next trees are announced

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, Good work! On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > Linux-next trees are announced on the linux-kernel and linux-next mailing > lists when they are assembled; they can be downloaded from: > > - http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/ >