On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 22:03 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:29:37 -0800 Matt Helsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew, please consider this patch for inclusion in -mm.
> >
> > ...
> >
>
> Can't say that we're particularly exercised about mvfs's problems, but the
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:29:37 -0800 Matt Helsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew, please consider this patch for inclusion in -mm.
>
> ...
>
Can't say that we're particularly exercised about mvfs's problems, but the
current way of doing /proc/pid/exe is indeed a nasty hack.
>
> fs/binf
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Engelhardt writes:
>
> On Jan 23 2008 10:29, Matt Helsley wrote:
> >
> >For executables on the stackable MVFS filesystem the current procfs
> >methods for implementing a task's exe symlink do not point to the
> >correct file and applications relying on the symli
Matt Helsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To solve the problem this patch changes the way that the kernel resolves a
> task's exe symlink. Instead of walking the VMAs to find the first
> executable file-backed VMA we store a reference to the exec'd file in the
> mm_struct -- /foo/bar/jvm/bin/java
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 10:29:37AM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> For executables on the stackable MVFS filesystem the current procfs methods
> for
> implementing a task's exe symlink do not point to the correct file and
> applications relying on the symlink fail (see the java example below).
Dou y
On Jan 23 2008 10:29, Matt Helsley wrote:
>
>For executables on the stackable MVFS filesystem the current procfs
>methods for implementing a task's exe symlink do not point to the
>correct file and applications relying on the symlink fail (see the
>java example below).
This reminds me of unoionfs
6 matches
Mail list logo
