On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:22:43AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 09:45:52PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > prot_sg_cnt has been assigned with the value of ret which we have
> > already checked to be non-zero so prot_sg_cnt can never be zero at this
> > point of the code
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 09:45:52PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> prot_sg_cnt has been assigned with the value of ret which we have
> already checked to be non-zero so prot_sg_cnt can never be zero at this
> point of the code and hence the else part can never execute.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Muk
2 matches
Mail list logo
