Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Will integrated sensors on DG965 motherboard be supported?
> They can be accessed only through the
> HECI interface, but the board has no AMT, and even if it had one, I don't
> think AMT includes HW sensors.
While talking about AMT ...
While talking about AMT: One quit
On Die, 2007-10-23 at 15:35 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:22:50AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > It's not a hard experiment to do.
> >
> > The answer is:
> >
> > warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
>
> A warning is not an error.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:22:50AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> It's not a hard experiment to do.
>
> The answer is:
>
> warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
A warning is not an error. It won't abort the compile.
The warning (which I don't remember gcc doing
> What does gcc have to say about if (foo = 0){ rather than if (foo == 0){
It's not a hard experiment to do.
The answer is:
warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a me
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:23:33AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> gcc will tell you in the other direction just as well.
>
> and people read from left to right (at least in english) so coding in
> that direction is generally preferred in the Linux kernel as well.
What does gcc have to say about
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:04:29 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:40:01AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > - Here:
> >
> > + if (0 == memcmp(&heci_wd_guid,
> >
> > we boringly prefer "if (foo == 0)" rather than "if (0 == foo)". (lots
> > of
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:04:29 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:40:01AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > - Here:
> >
> > + if (0 == memcmp(&heci_wd_guid,
> >
> > we boringly prefer "if (foo == 0)" rather than "if (0 == foo)".
> > (lots of pl
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:31:07 -0400 Anas Nashif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:22:38 -0400 Anas Nashif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> The patch is large so I'm placing the diff on the web for download
> >
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:40:01AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> - Here:
>
> + if (0 == memcmp(&heci_wd_guid,
>
> we boringly prefer "if (foo == 0)" rather than "if (0 == foo)". (lots
> of places).
But 0 == blah is safer. If you accidentally do 0 = blah the compiler
will tell y
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 15:35:37 Anas Nashif wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> >
> > Will integrated sensors on DG965 motherboard be supported?
> > They can be accessed only through the
> > HECI interface, but the board has no AMT, and even if it had one, I don't
> > think AMT includes
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 15:31:07 Anas Nashif wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:22:38 -0400 Anas Nashif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> The patch is large so I'm placing the diff on the web for download
> >> rather than attach
Hi,
Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Will integrated sensors on DG965 motherboard be supported?
They can be accessed only through the
HECI interface, but the board has no AMT, and even if it had one, I don't
think AMT includes HW sensors.
True, this is supported using QST.
Will it be supported?
Th
Andrew,
Thanks for the feedback.
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:22:38 -0400 Anas Nashif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The patch is large so I'm placing the diff on the web for download
rather than attaching it here. Download:
http://download.openamt.org/intel-MEI.diff
Please get
On Monday 22 October 2007 19:22:38 Anas Nashif wrote:
> The Manageability Engine Interface (aka HECI) allows applications to
> communicate with the Intel(R) Manageability Engine (ME) firmware.
>
> It is meant to be used by user-space manageability applications to
> access ME features such as Inte
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:22:38 -0400 Anas Nashif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Manageability Engine Interface (aka HECI) allows applications to
> communicate with the Intel(R) Manageability Engine (ME) firmware.
>
> It is meant to be used by user-space manageability applications to
> access ME
Hi,
Le lundi 22 octobre 2007 à 13:22 -0400, Anas Nashif a écrit :
> The Manageability Engine Interface (aka HECI) allows applications to
> communicate with the Intel(R) Manageability Engine (ME) firmware.
>
> It is meant to be used by user-space manageability applications to
> access ME features
16 matches
Mail list logo
