On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:49:04PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 31/10/2013 15:34, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > I haven't checked AMD doc, but if it is documented that lahf/sahf #UDs at 64
> > bit we should emulate it correctly.
>
> It says "The LAHF instruction can only be executed in 64-bit m
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:49:04PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 31/10/2013 15:34, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > I haven't checked AMD doc, but if it is documented that lahf/sahf #UDs at 64
> > bit we should emulate it correctly.
>
> It says "The LAHF instruction can only be executed in 64-bit m
Il 31/10/2013 15:34, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> I haven't checked AMD doc, but if it is documented that lahf/sahf #UDs at 64
> bit we should emulate it correctly.
It says "The LAHF instruction can only be executed in 64-bit mode if
supported by the processor implementation. Check the status of ECX
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:27:48PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 31/10/2013 15:21, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:29:42AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Yet another instruction that we fail to emulate, this time found
> >> in Windows 2008R2 32-bit.
> >>
> >> Cc: sta...
Il 31/10/2013 15:21, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:29:42AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Yet another instruction that we fail to emulate, this time found
>> in Windows 2008R2 32-bit.
>>
>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
>> ---
>> Testcase o
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:29:42AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Yet another instruction that we fail to emulate, this time found
> in Windows 2008R2 32-bit.
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> Testcase on its way. BTW, lahf/sahf is another candidate for
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
