On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
>
>
> With 2.6.23, you can try compiling acpi processor.ko as a module and
> doing insmod and rmmod in a loop. That should call cpu_idle_wait very
> frequently.
The thing is, after the full boot, there's too many things going on to
keep a system fu
Belay; Peter Zijlstra;
>Andi Kleen
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kick CPUS that might be sleeping in cpus_idle_wait
>
>
>
>On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > FYI, I just hit this hang on 2.6.24-rc6 without any extra
>patches. So,
>> > unless 2.6.24-rc7 did anythi
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > FYI, I just hit this hang on 2.6.24-rc6 without any extra patches. So,
> > unless 2.6.24-rc7 did anything to fix this issue, this is a high
> > priority bug (IMHO).
>
> i'm wondering why this only triggered now. Is this something new in
> 2.6.24?
It on
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 15:42 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > This patch is different than the first patch I sent out.
> > This one just sends an IPI to all CPUS that don't check in after 1 sec.
> >
> >
> > Sometimes cpu_idle_wait gets stuck because
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Rostedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:42 PM
>To: LKML
>Cc: Linus Torvalds; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar; Thomas
>Gleixner; Brown, Len; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Adam Belay; Peter
>Zijlstra; Andi Kleen
>Subject: [PATCH] Kick
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] Kick CPUS that might be sleeping in cpus_idle_wait
>
> s/cpus_/cpu_/
I've been up to 4am writing patches. I must be seeing double :-/
> > {
> > unsigned int cpu, this_cpu = get_cpu();
> > @@ -228,6 +232,13 @@ void cpu_idle_wai
> Subject: [PATCH] Kick CPUS that might be sleeping in cpus_idle_wait
s/cpus_/cpu_/
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:42:10 -0500
Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch is different than the first patch I sent out.
> This one just sends an IPI to all CPUS that don't check in after 1 sec.
>
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 15:42 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> This patch is different than the first patch I sent out.
> This one just sends an IPI to all CPUS that don't check in after 1 sec.
>
>
> Sometimes cpu_idle_wait gets stuck because it might miss CPUS that are
> already in idle, have no tas
8 matches
Mail list logo
