On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 04:13:04PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> We're trying to mask out bits[23:8] while retaining [32:24, 7:0], but
> we're doing the inverse. That doesn't have too much effect, since we're
> setting all the [23:8] bits to 1, and the other bits are only relevant
> for modes we're
On 2016/11/12 6:30, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 04:13:04PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
We're trying to mask out bits[23:8] while retaining [32:24, 7:0], but
we're doing the inverse. That doesn't have too much effect, since we're
setting all the [23:8] bits to 1, and the other bit
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 04:13:04PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> We're trying to mask out bits[23:8] while retaining [32:24, 7:0], but
> we're doing the inverse. That doesn't have too much effect, since we're
> setting all the [23:8] bits to 1, and the other bits are only relevant
> for modes we're
3 matches
Mail list logo
