Re: [PATCH] Reserved root VM + OOM killer

2000-11-24 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Pavel Machek wrote: > > HOW? > > No performance loss, RAM is always fully utilized (except if no swap), > > Handheld machines never have any swap, and alwys have little RAM [trust me, > velo1 I'm writing this on is so tuned that 100KB les and machine is useless]. > Unless r

Re: [PATCH] Reserved root VM + OOM killer

2000-11-23 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > HOW? > No performance loss, RAM is always fully utilized (except if no swap), Handheld machines never have any swap, and alwys have little RAM [trust me, velo1 I'm writing this on is so tuned that 100KB les and machine is useless]. Unless reservation can be turned off, it is not acceptab

Re: [PATCH] Reserved root VM + OOM killer

2000-11-22 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > > >- OOM killing takes place only in do_page_fault() [no two places in > > the kernel for process killing] > > ... disable OOM killing for non-x86 architectures. > This doesn't seem like a sm

Re: [PATCH] Reserved root VM + OOM killer

2000-11-22 Thread Rik van Riel
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: >- OOM killing takes place only in do_page_fault() [no two places in > the kernel for process killing] ... disable OOM killing for non-x86 architectures. This doesn't seem like a smart move ;) > diff -urw linux-2.2.18pre21/arch/i386/mm