Re: [PATCH] Xen/i386 cleanups - io_remap_pfn_range

On 17 Mar 2005, at 04:41, Randy.Dunlap wrote: Our io_remap_pfn_range() patches don't contain many collisions. My first patch [adding io_remap_pfn_range() to all arches] does go a little further than yours in that regard. Also, I was u

Re: [PATCH] Xen/i386 cleanups - io_remap_pfn_range

Keir Fraser wrote: This patch introduces a new interface function for mapping bus/device memory: io_remap_pfn_range. This accepts the same parameters as remap_pfn_range (indeed, by default it is implemented by this existing function) but should be used in any situation where the caller is not simpl

Re: [PATCH] Xen/i386 cleanups - io_remap_pfn_range

Keir Fraser wrote: This patch introduces a new interface function for mapping bus/device memory: io_remap_pfn_range. This accepts the same parameters as remap_pfn_range (indeed, by default it is implemented by this existing function) but should be used in any situation where the caller is not simpl