On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:45:56PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:46:12PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 June 2017 19:22:46 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Pali Rohár
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 20 June 2017 17:06:23 Lee, Chun-Y
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:46:12PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 June 2017 19:22:46 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Pali Rohár
> > wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 20 June 2017 17:06:23 Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > >> Pali Rohár found that there have some wmi query/evaluat
On Tuesday 20 June 2017 19:22:46 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 June 2017 17:06:23 Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> >> Pali Rohár found that there have some wmi query/evaluation
> >> code that they used 'one' as the first WMI instance number.
>
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 June 2017 17:06:23 Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
>> Pali Rohár found that there have some wmi query/evaluation
>> code that they used 'one' as the first WMI instance number.
>> But the number is indexed from zero that it's must less than
>>
On Tuesday 20 June 2017 17:06:23 Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> Pali Rohár found that there have some wmi query/evaluation
> code that they used 'one' as the first WMI instance number.
> But the number is indexed from zero that it's must less than
> the instance_count in _WDG.
>
> This patch changes those
5 matches
Mail list logo