On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:48:50PM -0700, Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:37:10PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:29:41PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > > On 21/10/20 12:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:21 +0530
>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:37:10PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:29:41PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
On 21/10/20 12:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:21 +0530
> Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Agreed. Do we really need to match X86 right now ? D
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:29:41PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 21/10/20 12:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:21 +0530
> > Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> Agreed. Do we really need to match X86 right now ? Do we really have
> >> systems that has 64 nodes ? We should
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:21:27PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2020-10-22 02:07, Vanshi Konda wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:44:15AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2020-10-21 12:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:21 +0530
Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/20/2020 11:39 P
On 10/22/20 11:25 AM, Vanshi Konda wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:21:27PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 2020-10-22 02:07, Vanshi Konda wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:44:15AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2020-10-21 12:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:2
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:21:27PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2020-10-22 02:07, Vanshi Konda wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:44:15AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2020-10-21 12:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:21 +0530
Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/20/2020 11:39 P
On 2020-10-22 02:07, Vanshi Konda wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:44:15AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2020-10-21 12:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:21 +0530
Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/20/2020 11:39 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
Hi,
Nit on the subject: this on
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:44:15AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2020-10-21 12:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:21 +0530
Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/20/2020 11:39 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
Hi,
Nit on the subject: this only increases the default, the max is still
On 2020-10-21 12:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:21 +0530
Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 10/20/2020 11:39 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
Hi,
Nit on the subject: this only increases the default, the max is still 2¹⁰.
Agreed.
On 20/10/20 18:34, Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
Hi,
On 21/10/20 12:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:21 +0530
> Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>> Agreed. Do we really need to match X86 right now ? Do we really have
>> systems that has 64 nodes ? We should not increase the default node
>> value and then try to solve some ne
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 07:09:36PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
Hi,
Nit on the subject: this only increases the default, the max is still 2?.
On 20/10/20 18:34, Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
The current arm64 max NUMA nodes default to 4. Today's arm64 systems can
reach or exceed 16. Increas
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:21 +0530
Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 10/20/2020 11:39 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nit on the subject: this only increases the default, the max is still 2¹⁰.
>
> Agreed.
>
> >
> > On 20/10/20 18:34, Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
> >> The current
On 10/20/2020 11:39 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Nit on the subject: this only increases the default, the max is still 2¹⁰.
Agreed.
>
> On 20/10/20 18:34, Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
>> The current arm64 max NUMA nodes default to 4. Today's arm64 systems can
>> reach or exceed 16.
Hi,
Nit on the subject: this only increases the default, the max is still 2¹⁰.
On 20/10/20 18:34, Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
> The current arm64 max NUMA nodes default to 4. Today's arm64 systems can
> reach or exceed 16. Increase the number to 64 (matching x86_64).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vanshidhar K
14 matches
Mail list logo