Hi Waiman,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.13-rc5 next-20170817]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Waiman-Long/cpuset-Allow-v2-behavior-in-v1-cg
Hi Waiman,
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.13-rc5 next-20170817]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Waiman-Long/cpuset-Allow-v2-behavior-in-v
On 08/16/2017 10:36 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:34:05AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> It feels weird to make this a kernel boot param when all other options
>>> are specified on mount time. Is there a reason why this can't be a
>>> mount option too?
>>>
>> Yes, we
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:34:05AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > It feels weird to make this a kernel boot param when all other options
> > are specified on mount time. Is there a reason why this can't be a
> > mount option too?
> >
> Yes, we can certainly make this a mount option instead
On 08/16/2017 10:29 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Waiman.
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 01:27:20PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> +cpuset_v2_mode= [KNL] Enable cpuset v2 behavior in cpuset v1 cgroups.
>> +In v2 mode, the cpus and mems can be restored to
>> +t
Hello, Waiman.
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 01:27:20PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> + cpuset_v2_mode= [KNL] Enable cpuset v2 behavior in cpuset v1 cgroups.
> + In v2 mode, the cpus and mems can be restored to
> + their original values after a removal-addition
On 2017/8/16 1:27, Waiman Long wrote:
> Cpuset v2 has some valuable attributes that are not present in
> v1 because of backward compatibility concern. One of that is the
> restoration of the original cpu and memory node mask after a hot
> removal and addition event sequence.
>
> This patch adds a
7 matches
Mail list logo
