Linus wrote:
> We _really_ don't want to have function names like "cs_up()"
I thoroughly agree with your attention to naming, and spent more time
than I will admit in public futzing over this detail.
I wrote the code using cpuset_lock(void) and cpuset_unlock(void), for
reasons such as you state,
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Paul Jackson wrote:
>
> This patch fixes this deadlock by wrapping the up() and down()
> calls on cpuset_sem in kernel/cpuset.c with code that tracks
> the nesting depth of the current task on that semaphore,
We _really_ don't want to have function names like "cs_up()" and
"c
2 matches
Mail list logo
