On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:48:16AM +0200, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 12:25 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >Given that no one is working on it, why does it need to be maintained
> >easier? :)
>
> Thanks for your immediate response.
> I was thinking to work on this driver. Is it goin
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:48:16AM +0200, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> I will fix it.
I don't know the status of this driver.
But in general the patch should have been divided up into smaller
changes and sent as a patchset. It creates a bunch of messy new
globals where it would have been cleaner t
On 02/01/2013 12:25 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Given that no one is working on it, why does it need to be maintained
easier? :)
Thanks for your immediate response.
I was thinking to work on this driver. Is it going to be obsolete or
something?
Why create a .h file? Who needs it? Only
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:32:06PM +0200, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> This patch restructures code for better readability and easier
> maintenance.
Given that no one is working on it, why does it need to be maintained
easier? :)
> Also introduces lowmemorykiller.h header file.
Why create a .h fi
4 matches
Mail list logo