On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:32:40 + Eric Wong wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It's going to be hard to maintain this - someone will change something
> > sometime and break it. I suppose we could add a runtime check if we
> > cared enough. Adding a big fat comment to struct epitem might help.
>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> It's going to be hard to maintain this - someone will change something
> sometime and break it. I suppose we could add a runtime check if we
> cared enough. Adding a big fat comment to struct epitem might help.
Thanks for looking at this patch. I'll send a patch with a c
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:29:41 + Eric Wong wrote:
> It is common for epoll users to have thousands of epitems, so saving a
> cache line on every allocation leads to large memory savings.
>
> Since epitem allocations are cache-aligned, reducing sizeof(struct
> epitem) from 136 bytes to 128 bytes
3 matches
Mail list logo