Andrew Morton a écrit :
This all depends on the offset of the inode, and you don't know what that is.
offsetof(ext3_inode_info, vfs_inode) != offsetof(nfs_inode, vfs_inode), etc.
Doh... yes you are absolutly right :) I feel dumb now :(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:52:04 +0100
Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I didn't understand that paragraph at all, really, so I took it out.
> >
> > At present an i_size change will dirty one, two or three cachelines, most
> > likely one or two.
> >
> > After your patch an i_size change w
Andrew Morton a écrit :
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:57:29 +0100
Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 32bits SMP platforms, 64bits i_size is protected by a seqcount
(i_size_seqcount).
When i_size is read or written, i_size_seqcount is read/written as well, so it
make sense to group these two
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:57:29 +0100
Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 32bits SMP platforms, 64bits i_size is protected by a seqcount
> (i_size_seqcount).
>
> When i_size is read or written, i_size_seqcount is read/written as well, so
> it
> make sense to group these two fields togeth
4 matches
Mail list logo
