On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 1:47 AM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> From: Masahiro Yamada
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 4:11 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > BTW, is this a speedup when doing CC/LD FLAGS etc checks unconditionally?
> >
> > Yes.
> > cc-option is somewhat costly because it invoked the compiler to
From: Masahiro Yamada
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 4:11 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > BTW, is this a speedup when doing CC/LD FLAGS etc checks unconditionally?
>
> Yes.
> cc-option is somewhat costly because it invoked the compiler to
> check if the given flag is supported.
>
> So, I want to get rid of a
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 03:46:35PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> These flags are documented in the GCC 4.6 manual, and recognized by
> Clang as well. Let's rip off the cc-option / cc-disable-warning switches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor
> ---
>
> scrip
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 4:11 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:47 AM Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> >
> > These flags are documented in the GCC 4.6 manual, and recognized by
> > Clang as well. Let's rip off the cc-option / cc-disable-warning switches.
> >
>
> BTW, is this a speedup wh
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:47 AM Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> These flags are documented in the GCC 4.6 manual, and recognized by
> Clang as well. Let's rip off the cc-option / cc-disable-warning switches.
>
BTW, is this a speedup when doing CC/LD FLAGS etc checks unconditionally?
Asking in general -
5 matches
Mail list logo