On 3/28/21 3:32 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 15:26 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 3/27/21 3:12 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>>> * On 3/27/21 4:58 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 3/27/21 5:01 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> + if ((-1 == index) && (index == match_start))
On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 11:27 +0200, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> * On 3/27/21 11:26 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > There is a test for it in checkpatch.pl but I also used checkpatch.pl
> > without it complaining, so I don't know what it takes to make the script
> > complain.
> >
> > if
On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 15:26 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 3/27/21 3:12 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> > * On 3/27/21 4:58 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 3/27/21 5:01 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> > > > + if ((-1 == index) && (index == match_start))
> > >
> > > checkpatch doesn't compl
* On 3/27/21 11:26 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> There is a test for it in checkpatch.pl but I also used checkpatch.pl
> without it complaining, so I don't know what it takes to make the script
> complain.
>
> if ($lead !~ /(?:$Operators|\.)\s*$/ &&
> $t
On 3/27/21 3:12 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> * On 3/27/21 4:58 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 3/27/21 5:01 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>>> + if ((-1 == index) && (index == match_start))
>>
>> checkpatch doesn't complain about this (and I wonder how it's missed), but
>> kernel style is (mostly
* On 3/27/21 4:58 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 3/27/21 5:01 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>> +if ((-1 == index) && (index == match_start))
>
> checkpatch doesn't complain about this (and I wonder how it's missed), but
> kernel style is (mostly) "constant goes on right hand side of comparis
On 3/27/21 5:01 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> If the user selects the very first entry in a page and performs a
> search-up operation (e.g., via [/][a][Up Arrow]), nconf will never
> terminate searching the page.
>
> The reason is that in this case, the starting point will be set to -1,
> which is t
7 matches
Mail list logo
