On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 08:32:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 8:04 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> > Might be worth optimizing strnlen etc with the word-at-a-time thing though.
>
> Yeah, possibly. Except the kernel almost never uses strnlen for
> anything bigger. At least
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 8:04 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 05:44:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Using -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns seems to really be a bit too
> > incestuous with internal compiler knowledge.
>
> Fair enough -- you ok with just the -ffreestanding
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 05:44:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:43 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
> >
> > This by itself is insufficient for gcc if the optimization was
> > explicitly enabled by CFLAGS, so also add a flag to explicitly disable
> > it.
>
> Using -fno-tree-loop
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:43 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> This by itself is insufficient for gcc if the optimization was
> explicitly enabled by CFLAGS, so also add a flag to explicitly disable
> it.
Using -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns seems to really be a bit too
incestuous with internal com
4 matches
Mail list logo