On 15/09/2020 18:12, Sean Young wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:36:08PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> Currently the LIRC_GET_MIN_TIMEOUT is checking for a null dev->max_timeout
>> and then accessing dev->min_timeout, hence we may have a potential null
>> pointer derefe
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:36:08PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> Currently the LIRC_GET_MIN_TIMEOUT is checking for a null dev->max_timeout
> and then accessing dev->min_timeout, hence we may have a potential null
> pointer dereference issue. This looks like a cut-n-paste t
2 matches
Mail list logo