Re: [PATCH] memcg: stop warning on memcg_propagate_kmem

2013-02-04 Thread Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
On 02/04/2013 12:36 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 04-02-13 12:04:06, Glauber Costa wrote: >> On 02/04/2013 11:57 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Sun 03-02-13 20:29:01, Hugh Dickins wrote: Whilst I run the risk of a flogging for disloyalty to the Lord of Sealand, I do have CONFIG_MEMCG=y

Re: [PATCH] memcg: stop warning on memcg_propagate_kmem

2013-02-04 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 04-02-13 12:04:06, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 02/04/2013 11:57 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Sun 03-02-13 20:29:01, Hugh Dickins wrote: > >> Whilst I run the risk of a flogging for disloyalty to the Lord of Sealand, > >> I do have CONFIG_MEMCG=y CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM not set, and grow tired of t

Re: [PATCH] memcg: stop warning on memcg_propagate_kmem

2013-02-04 Thread Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
On 02/04/2013 11:57 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Sun 03-02-13 20:29:01, Hugh Dickins wrote: >> Whilst I run the risk of a flogging for disloyalty to the Lord of Sealand, >> I do have CONFIG_MEMCG=y CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM not set, and grow tired of the >> "mm/memcontrol.c:4972:12: warning: `memcg_propaga

Re: [PATCH] memcg: stop warning on memcg_propagate_kmem

2013-02-03 Thread Michal Hocko
On Sun 03-02-13 20:29:01, Hugh Dickins wrote: > Whilst I run the risk of a flogging for disloyalty to the Lord of Sealand, > I do have CONFIG_MEMCG=y CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM not set, and grow tired of the > "mm/memcontrol.c:4972:12: warning: `memcg_propagate_kmem' defined but not > used [-Wunused-functio

Re: [PATCH] memcg: stop warning on memcg_propagate_kmem

2013-02-03 Thread Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
On 02/04/2013 08:29 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > Whilst I run the risk of a flogging for disloyalty to the Lord of Sealand, > I do have CONFIG_MEMCG=y CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM not set, and grow tired of the > "mm/memcontrol.c:4972:12: warning: `memcg_propagate_kmem' defined but not > used [-Wunused-function]