Lee,
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> It's great to see this on the list, because I find your workflow as a
>> maintainer to be hard to follow as a developer.
>>
>> You applying patches but taking several days to push out makes it
>> completely opaque for someone to know if yo
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> Lee (-others),
> >
> > Re-CC'ing the list.
> >
> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> >> From: Prathyush K
> >> >>
> >> >> Set the device as wakeup capable and register the w
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> Lee (-others),
>
> Re-CC'ing the list.
>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >> From: Prathyush K
>> >>
>> >> Set the device as wakeup capable and register the wakeup source.
>> >>
>> >> Note: Though it makes more sense to
Lee,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> Lee (-others),
>
> Re-CC'ing the list.
>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >> From: Prathyush K
>> >>
>> >> Set the device as wakeup capable and register the wakeup source.
>> >>
>> >> Note: Though it makes more sen
> Lee (-others),
Re-CC'ing the list.
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> From: Prathyush K
> >>
> >> Set the device as wakeup capable and register the wakeup source.
> >>
> >> Note: Though it makes more sense to have the SPI framework do this,
> >> (either via device tree o
> From: Prathyush K
>
> Set the device as wakeup capable and register the wakeup source.
>
> Note: Though it makes more sense to have the SPI framework do this,
> (either via device tree or by board_info)
> this change is as per an existing mail chain:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/27/291
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
