On Thu 11-04-19 13:18:07, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 11.04.19 12:56, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 11-04-19 11:11:05, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 11.04.19 10:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> On Wed 10-04-19 12:14:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> While current node handling is probably
On 11.04.19 12:56, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 11-04-19 11:11:05, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 11.04.19 10:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 10-04-19 12:14:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
While current node handling is probably terribly broken for memory block
devices that span several
On Thu 11-04-19 11:11:05, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 11.04.19 10:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 10-04-19 12:14:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> While current node handling is probably terribly broken for memory block
> >> devices that span several nodes (only possible when added during
On 11.04.19 10:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 10-04-19 12:14:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> While current node handling is probably terribly broken for memory block
>> devices that span several nodes (only possible when added during boot,
>> and something like that should be blocked
On Wed 10-04-19 12:14:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> While current node handling is probably terribly broken for memory block
> devices that span several nodes (only possible when added during boot,
> and something like that should be blocked completely), properly put the
> device reference we
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:14:55PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>While current node handling is probably terribly broken for memory block
>devices that span several nodes (only possible when added during boot,
>and something like that should be blocked completely), properly put the
>device
On 10.04.19 14:28, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:14:55PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> While current node handling is probably terribly broken for memory block
>> devices that span several nodes (only possible when added during boot,
>> and something like that should be
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:14:55PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> While current node handling is probably terribly broken for memory block
> devices that span several nodes (only possible when added during boot,
> and something like that should be blocked completely), properly put the
> device
8 matches
Mail list logo