On 2013/9/17 4:26, Cody P Schafer wrote:
>
>> @@ -1802,11 +1802,11 @@ static inline unsigned interleave_nid(struct
>> mempolicy *pol,
>>
>> /*
>>* Return the bit number of a random bit set in the nodemask.
>> - * (returns -1 if nodemask is empty)
>> + * (returns NUMA_NO_NOD if nodemask is
On 2013/9/17 0:19, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> (9/16/13 8:53 AM), Jianguo Wu wrote:
>> Use more appropriate NUMA_NO_NODE instead of -1
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu
>> ---
>> mm/mempolicy.c | 10 +-
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> I think this patch don't make
@@ -1802,11 +1802,11 @@ static inline unsigned interleave_nid(struct mempolicy
*pol,
/*
* Return the bit number of a random bit set in the nodemask.
- * (returns -1 if nodemask is empty)
+ * (returns NUMA_NO_NOD if nodemask is empty)
s/NUMA_NO_NOD/NUMA_NO_NODE/
*/
int node_random
(9/16/13 8:53 AM), Jianguo Wu wrote:
Use more appropriate NUMA_NO_NODE instead of -1
Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
I think this patch don't make any functional change, right?
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
--
4 matches
Mail list logo