On 05/12/2016 01:58 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
On 2016/5/12 19:36, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 05/09/2016 12:02 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
Sounds ok, please try.
Hi Vlastimil and Naoya,
The mainline doesn't have this problem, because commit
add05cecef80 ("mm: soft-offline: don't free target page in succ
On 2016/5/12 19:36, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 12:02 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> On 2016/5/9 17:39, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/09/2016 10:34 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
If the pfn is not aligned to pageblock, the check pfn may access a next
pageblcok, and the next pageblock may
On 05/09/2016 12:02 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
On 2016/5/9 17:39, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 05/09/2016 10:34 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
If the pfn is not aligned to pageblock, the check pfn may access a next
pageblcok, and the next pageblock may belong to a next section. Because
struct page has not been a
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 06:02:32PM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2016/5/9 17:39, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> > On 05/09/2016 10:34 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> >> If the pfn is not aligned to pageblock, the check pfn may access a next
> >> pageblcok, and the next pageblock may belong to a next section. Be
On 2016/5/9 17:39, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 10:34 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> If the pfn is not aligned to pageblock, the check pfn may access a next
>> pageblcok, and the next pageblock may belong to a next section. Because
>> struct page has not been alloced in the next section, so ker
On 05/09/2016 10:34 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
If the pfn is not aligned to pageblock, the check pfn may access a next
pageblcok, and the next pageblock may belong to a next section. Because
struct page has not been alloced in the next section, so kernel panic.
I find the caller of has_unmovable_pages
6 matches
Mail list logo
