Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do those patches convert all this code over to full use of the kthread
> API? Because it seems that a conversion would be straightforward, and
> is needed.
No. They delete all that code entirely and use workqueues instead. So, I
suppose merging Eric's
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:32:38 +0100
David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
> > to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
> > and daemonize making the code slig
David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
>> to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
>> and daemonize making the code slightly simpler and more maintainable.
>
Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch modifies the startup of krxtimod, krxiod, and krxsecd
> to use kthread_run instead of a combination of kernel_thread
> and daemonize making the code slightly simpler and more maintainable.
Again, please drop in favour of my RxRPC patches.
4 matches
Mail list logo