On 7/10/12 11:14 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote:
Does this fix it for you:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/6/405
Yeah, same problem.
But the question is if there have some sample event with raw data in
perf.data, are we still just exit(1)?
or let perf-lock only report those sample events with raw data?
On 7/10/12 11:14 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote:
Does this fix it for you:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/6/405
Yeah, same problem.
But the question is if there have some sample event with raw data in
perf.data, are we still just exit(1)?
or let perf-lock only report those sample events with raw data?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/10/12 7:06 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote:
>>
>> From 4b363bf16c12b76788fbace1475123b7214ae58d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jovi Zhang
>> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:53:57 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump
>>
>>
On 7/10/12 7:06 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote:
From 4b363bf16c12b76788fbace1475123b7214ae58d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jovi Zhang
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:53:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump
Check sample type event raw_data is existed in perf.data firstly,
then
On 7/10/12 7:06 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote:
From 4b363bf16c12b76788fbace1475123b7214ae58d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jovi Zhang bookj...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:53:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump
Check sample type event raw_data is existed in perf.data
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, David Ahern dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/10/12 7:06 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote:
From 4b363bf16c12b76788fbace1475123b7214ae58d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jovi Zhang bookj...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:53:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock
6 matches
Mail list logo