Jiri Olsa wrote:
> but looks like the usage is for bash completion only, so we probably
> need only the first example functionality above.
>
> If this is the case I think it should not be an option but another
> command like 'raw-dump'.
I decided that there's no point making it an option, so I've
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 05:27:41PM -0400, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> While adding usage information, 44d742e (perf list: Add usage,
> 2013-10-30) broke
>
> $ perf list --raw-dump
>
> Fix this by making raw-dump a proper argument.
>
> Cc: David Ahern
> Cc: Jiri Olsa
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho
On 12/29/2013 05:11 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
So is the patch below the one to apply? When these things happen, it
helps if you resubmit with a v2 in the subject line and then an explicit
Ack is provided, be it from, in this case, David, or Ramkumar could ju
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> So is the patch below the one to apply? When these things happen, it
> helps if you resubmit with a v2 in the subject line and then an explicit
> Ack is provided, be it from, in this case, David, or Ramkumar could just
> add it since David provided it in free form,
Em Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:04:04PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra escreveu:
> David Ahern wrote:
> > Why not make raw_dump a proper argument?
>
> Sure, that'd work too. I was thinking of a minimal way to fix the
> problem myself.
So is the patch below the one to apply? When these things happen, it
h
On 12/12/2013 02:34 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
David Ahern wrote:
Why not make raw_dump a proper argument?
Sure, that'd work too. I was thinking of a minimal way to fix the
problem myself.
Hi Ramkumar and David,
If this argument is only used for perf complement, how about make
it hi
On 12/12/13, 12:34 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
David Ahern wrote:
Why not make raw_dump a proper argument?
Sure, that'd work too. I was thinking of a minimal way to fix the
problem myself.
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-list.c b/tools/perf/builtin-list.c
index 011195e38f21..b553d0c4ca82
David Ahern wrote:
> Why not make raw_dump a proper argument?
Sure, that'd work too. I was thinking of a minimal way to fix the
problem myself.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-list.c b/tools/perf/builtin-list.c
> index 011195e38f21..b553d0c4ca82 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-list.c
> +++ b/
On 12/11/13, 3:16 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
While adding usage information, 44d742e (perf list: Add usage,
2013-10-30) broke
$ perf list --raw-dump
by asking parse_options() to stop at
non-option (PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION), hence parsing the option
--raw-dump and barfing. Ask it to
9 matches
Mail list logo