Re: [PATCH] procfs fixes for inotify/dnotify

2007-07-19 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:03:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8782 [fsnotify and /proc] > > --- linux-2.6.15/fs/proc/base.c > > +++ linux-2.6.15.4/fs/proc/base.c > > @@ -1945,6 +1945,7 @@ > > if(proc_dentry != NULL) { > >

Re: [PATCH] procfs fixes for inotify/dnotify

2007-07-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:16:23 +0100 Thomas Ogrisegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Problem description: > When a new process is created, the creation of the respective PID > subdirectory of /proc is deferred until the /proc-directory is beeing > read (by e.g. ps(1)). This causes file notification

Re: [PATCH] procfs fixes for inotify/dnotify

2007-07-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:16:23 +0100 Thomas Ogrisegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Problem description: When a new process is created, the creation of the respective PID subdirectory of /proc is deferred until the /proc-directory is beeing read (by e.g. ps(1)). This causes file notification

Re: [PATCH] procfs fixes for inotify/dnotify

2007-07-19 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:03:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8782 [fsnotify and /proc] --- linux-2.6.15/fs/proc/base.c +++ linux-2.6.15.4/fs/proc/base.c @@ -1945,6 +1945,7 @@ if(proc_dentry != NULL) {