On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:33:35PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:30:58 -0500
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > I just realized that I received this patch twice, and thought it was the
> > same patch! Chen was three days ahead of you, so he get's the credit ;-)
> >
> > https:/
On 2021/3/3 6:30, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:01:17 +
Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 09:44:26AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
This requires an acked-by from one of the ARM64 maintainers.
-- Steve
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:07:47 +0800
Li Huafei wrote:
W
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:30:58 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I just realized that I received this patch twice, and thought it was the
> same patch! Chen was three days ahead of you, so he get's the credit ;-)
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210222135840.56250-1-chenjun...@huawei.com
I'm applying
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:01:17 +
Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 09:44:26AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > This requires an acked-by from one of the ARM64 maintainers.
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:07:47 +0800
> > Li Huafei wrote:
> >
> > > When cross
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:01:17 +
Will Deacon wrote:
> Acked-by: Will Deacon
Thanks!
>
> But you know you could avoid these sorts of problems by moving to little
> endian along with everybody else? ;)
But then how do we find these bug?
-- Steve
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 09:44:26AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> This requires an acked-by from one of the ARM64 maintainers.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:07:47 +0800
> Li Huafei wrote:
>
> > When cross-compiling the kernel, the endian of the target machine and
> > the local mach
This requires an acked-by from one of the ARM64 maintainers.
-- Steve
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:07:47 +0800
Li Huafei wrote:
> When cross-compiling the kernel, the endian of the target machine and
> the local machine may not match, at this time the recordmcount tool
> needs byte reversal when pro
7 matches
Mail list logo
