On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:28:37 +
Will Deacon wrote:
> I see you're playing "chase the patches" at the moment ;)
>
Why yes I am!
Trying to grab last minute patches from my INBOX (or they could be old
patches that I just missed), before kicking off my 12 hour test suite.
-- Steve
--
To unsubsc
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:26:08PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:00:28 +0800
> libin wrote:
>
> > It is a bug in nop_mcount:
> > ...
> > if (mcountsym == Elf_r_sym(relp) && !is_fake_mcount(relp)) {
> > if (make_nop) {
> > ret = make_nop((void *)ehdr
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:00:28 +0800
libin wrote:
> It is a bug in nop_mcount:
> ...
> if (mcountsym == Elf_r_sym(relp) && !is_fake_mcount(relp)) {
> if (make_nop) {
> ret = make_nop((void *)ehdr, shdr->sh_offset +
> relp->r_offset);
> }
> ...
>
> shdr->sh_offset a
在 2015/10/29 23:09, Will Deacon 写道:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:35:42PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core -- if it's inappropriate base,
>> please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
>>
>> url:
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linu
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:35:42PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core -- if it's inappropriate base,
> please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
>
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Li-Bin/recordmcount-arm64-replace-
Hi Li,
[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core -- if it's inappropriate base,
please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Li-Bin/recordmcount-arm64-replace-the-ignored-mcount-call-into-nop/20151028-160846
config: arm64-allmod
On 10/28/2015 08:58 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:16:19AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0800
Li Bin wrote:
By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
following sections:
.text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:16:19AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0800
> Li Bin wrote:
>
> > By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
> > following sections:
> > .text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
> > .kprobes.text/.text.unli
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0800
Li Bin wrote:
> By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
> following sections:
> .text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
> .kprobes.text/.text.unlikely
>
> For the function that not in these sections, the call mcount
> will
9 matches
Mail list logo
