On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 01:21:46PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2017-12-12 13:18 GMT+01:00 Mark Brown :
> > That's true, and the debugfs is world readable too so we can't just say
> > it's up to root to be sensible.
> This lock is only taken when writing to cache_only and cache_bypass thou
2017-12-12 13:18 GMT+01:00 Mark Brown :
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:42:47PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 12/06/2017 03:26 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>
>> > + * @disable_locking: This regmap is either protected by external means or
>> > + * is guaranteed not be be ac
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:42:47PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 12/06/2017 03:26 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > + * @disable_locking: This regmap is either protected by external means or
> > + * is guaranteed not be be accessed from multiple
> > threads.
> To guara
On 12/06/2017 03:26 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
[...]
> + * @disable_locking: This regmap is either protected by external means or
> + * is guaranteed not be be accessed from multiple threads.
To guarantee this you need to make sure that a regmap instance with this
flag set do
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 01:12:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >>> +static void regmap_lock_unlock_empty(void *__map)
> >> ..._none()?
> > Too late, Mark already applied it.
> Ah, Mark always works at speed of light!
An increme
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2017-12-10 14:10 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko :
>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> We have a use case in the at24 EEPROM driver (recently converted to
>>> using regmap instead of raw i2c/smbus calls) where w
2017-12-10 14:10 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko :
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> We have a use case in the at24 EEPROM driver (recently converted to
>> using regmap instead of raw i2c/smbus calls) where we read from/write
>> to the regmap in a loop, while protecting the
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> We have a use case in the at24 EEPROM driver (recently converted to
> using regmap instead of raw i2c/smbus calls) where we read from/write
> to the regmap in a loop, while protecting the entire loop with
> a mutex.
>
> Currently this im
8 matches
Mail list logo