2012/8/28 Laxman Dewangan :
> I tried to reproduce the lockup issue with the following change but not
> seeing any lockup issue.
Did you enable CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING?
> Also reviewing the change, I am not seeing any call trace where the
> recursive locking happening.
There's probably no actual re
On Saturday 25 August 2012 05:10 AM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:22:05PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
I tried to reproduce the issue but could not able to do this.
Can you please send me your board/dt files where you are porviding
platform data for regulator?
This will help
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:22:05PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> I tried to reproduce the issue but could not able to do this.
> Can you please send me your board/dt files where you are porviding
> platform data for regulator?
> This will help me to reproduce the issue.
Here's a dts patch:
diff
On Thursday 23 August 2012 08:13 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2012 08:23 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:15:12PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Hi Rabin,
Is it resolved the issue you mentioned?
He replied to your mail pointing out that it generated a lockdep
On Thursday 23 August 2012 08:13 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2012 08:23 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:15:12PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Hi Rabin,
Is it resolved the issue you mentioned?
He replied to your mail pointing out that it generated a lockdep
On Thursday 23 August 2012 08:23 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:15:12PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Hi Rabin,
Is it resolved the issue you mentioned?
He replied to your mail pointing out that it generated a lockdep issue.
Thanks Mark for letting me know. The mail transfer to
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:15:12PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Hi Rabin,
> Is it resolved the issue you mentioned?
He replied to your mail pointing out that it generated a lockdep issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo
Hi Rabin,
Is it resolved the issue you mentioned?
Thanks,
Laxman
On Tuesday 14 August 2012 03:37 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
If supply regulator is enabled because of boot-on (not always-on)
then disable regulator need to be call if regulator have some
user or full constraint has been enabled.
T
2012/8/14 Laxman Dewangan :
> If supply regulator is enabled because of boot-on (not always-on)
> then disable regulator need to be call if regulator have some
> user or full constraint has been enabled.
> This will make sure that reference count of supply regulator
> is in sync with child regulato
9 matches
Mail list logo
