Re: [PATCH] sched/core: add taint on "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context"

2016-07-29 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Rusty Russell wrote: > Vegard Nossum writes: > > Seeing this, it occurs to me that we should probably add a taint here: > > Taint has traditionally meant "the user did something unsupported, take > the bug report with a grain of salt". Such as force removing a module. We ha

Re: [PATCH] sched/core: add taint on "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context"

2016-07-28 Thread Vegard Nossum
On 07/29/2016 03:22 AM, Rusty Russell wrote: Vegard Nossum writes: Seeing this, it occurs to me that we should probably add a taint here: Taint has traditionally meant "the user did something unsupported, take the bug report with a grain of salt". Such as force removing a module. So this se

Re: [PATCH] sched/core: add taint on "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context"

2016-07-28 Thread Rusty Russell
Vegard Nossum writes: > Seeing this, it occurs to me that we should probably add a taint here: Taint has traditionally meant "the user did something unsupported, take the bug report with a grain of salt". Such as force removing a module. So this seems wrong... Cheers, Rusty. > > BUG: sle