On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 10:14 +0800, 王擎 wrote:
> >>
> >> * Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 19:20 +0800, Wang Qing wrote:
> >> > > Why not just use wake_up_process().
> >> >
> >> > IMO this is not an improvement. There are other places where explicit
> >> > TASK_NORMAL is
On Wed, Mar 17 2021 at 11:41, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 10:46 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 19:20 +0800, Wang Qing wrote:
>> > > Why not just use wake_up_process().
>> >
>> > IMO this is not an improvement. There are other
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 10:46 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 19:20 +0800, Wang Qing wrote:
> > > Why not just use wake_up_process().
> >
> > IMO this is not an improvement. There are other places where explicit
> > TASK_NORMAL is used as well, and
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:46:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 19:20 +0800, Wang Qing wrote:
> > > Why not just use wake_up_process().
> >
> > IMO this is not an improvement. There are other places where explicit
> > TASK_NORMAL is used as
* Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 19:20 +0800, Wang Qing wrote:
> > Why not just use wake_up_process().
>
> IMO this is not an improvement. There are other places where explicit
> TASK_NORMAL is used as well, and they're all perfectly clear as is.
Arguably those could all be
On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 19:20 +0800, Wang Qing wrote:
> Why not just use wake_up_process().
IMO this is not an improvement. There are other places where explicit
TASK_NORMAL is used as well, and they're all perfectly clear as is.
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing
> ---
> kernel/sched/swait.c | 2 +-
>
6 matches
Mail list logo