On 01/09/2015 03:48 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 09 January 2015 00:13:28 Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 01/08/2015 05:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 08 January 2015 11:11:51 Peter Hurley wrote:
This interface is just storage and minor allocation, since the
port-reuse
On Friday 09 January 2015 00:13:28 Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 01/08/2015 05:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 January 2015 11:11:51 Peter Hurley wrote:
> >>
> >> This interface is just storage and minor allocation, since the
> >> port-reuse behavior will be limited to the "universal" dri
On 01/08/2015 05:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 08 January 2015 11:11:51 Peter Hurley wrote:
>>
>> This interface is just storage and minor allocation, since the
>> port-reuse behavior will be limited to the "universal" driver.
>> From a sub-driver perspective, the shared storage is actu
On 01/08/2015 05:36 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>> One idea that has come up in the past but never saw an implementation
>> is to make the ttyS namespace and minor numbers completely generic and
>> let any serial port driver use it. This would be a major rework, but
>> have the added advantage o
> One idea that has come up in the past but never saw an implementation
> is to make the ttyS namespace and minor numbers completely generic and
> let any serial port driver use it. This would be a major rework, but
> have the added advantage of cleaning up a number of other namespace
> issues as w
On Thursday 08 January 2015 11:11:51 Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> This interface is just storage and minor allocation, since the
> port-reuse behavior will be limited to the "universal" driver.
> From a sub-driver perspective, the shared storage is actually
> a hindrance, so that reduces the requiremen
On 01/08/2015 08:10 AM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 22:09:45 -0500
> Peter Hurley wrote:
>
>> Some arches have no need to create unprobed 8250 ports; these phantom
>> ports are primarily required for ISA ports which have no probe
>> mechanism or to provide non-operational por
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 22:09:45 -0500
Peter Hurley wrote:
> Some arches have no need to create unprobed 8250 ports; these phantom
> ports are primarily required for ISA ports which have no probe
> mechanism or to provide non-operational ports for userspace to
> configure (via TIOCSSERIAL and TIOCSER
On Tuesday 06 January 2015 16:47:55 Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 02:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 January 2015 09:32:02 Peter Hurley wrote:
> >> On 01/06/2015 08:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> On Monday 05 January 2015 22:09:45 Peter Hurley wrote:
> Some arches have n
On 01/06/2015 02:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2015 09:32:02 Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 01/06/2015 08:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Monday 05 January 2015 22:09:45 Peter Hurley wrote:
Some arches have no need to create unprobed 8250 ports; these phantom
ports are
On Tuesday 06 January 2015 09:32:02 Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 08:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 05 January 2015 22:09:45 Peter Hurley wrote:
> >> Some arches have no need to create unprobed 8250 ports; these phantom
> >> ports are primarily required for ISA ports which have no
On 01/06/2015 08:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2015 22:09:45 Peter Hurley wrote:
>> Some arches have no need to create unprobed 8250 ports; these phantom
>> ports are primarily required for ISA ports which have no probe
>> mechanism or to provide non-operational ports for users
On Monday 05 January 2015 22:09:45 Peter Hurley wrote:
> Some arches have no need to create unprobed 8250 ports; these phantom
> ports are primarily required for ISA ports which have no probe
> mechanism or to provide non-operational ports for userspace to
> configure (via TIOCSSERIAL and TIOCSERCO
13 matches
Mail list logo
