On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:02:55AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 03:56:41PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:58:56AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:28:58AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'll split the p
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 03:56:41PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:58:56AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:28:58AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > > I'll split the patch into two parts, and only add (hopefully)
> > > non-controversial tpm
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:58:56AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:28:58AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > I'll split the patch into two parts, and only add (hopefully)
> > non-controversial tpm2 attributes for now (which I think is durations
> > and timeouts). Or, in
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:28:58AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I'll split the patch into two parts, and only add (hopefully)
> non-controversial tpm2 attributes for now (which I think is durations
> and timeouts). Or, in other words, I'll split the attributes into
> two groups - one generic and
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 01:49:47AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 04:17:28PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 02:45:23PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > > "tpm: Enable sysfs support for TPM2 devices
> > >
> > > Access to chip->ops on TPM2 devi
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 04:17:28PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 02:45:23PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > "tpm: Enable sysfs support for TPM2 devices
> >
> > Access to chip->ops on TPM2 devices requires an explicit lock,
> > since the pointer is set to NULL in tpm_cl
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 02:45:23PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:13:23AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:25:01PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > Add explicit chip->ops locking for all sysfs attributes.
> > > This lets us support those attrib
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 02:45:23PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> "tpm: Enable sysfs support for TPM2 devices
>
> Access to chip->ops on TPM2 devices requires an explicit lock,
> since the pointer is set to NULL in tpm_class_shutdown().
> Implement that lock for sysfs access functions and enable s
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:13:23AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:25:01PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Add explicit chip->ops locking for all sysfs attributes.
> > This lets us support those attributes on tpm2 devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
> > ---
>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:25:01PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Add explicit chip->ops locking for all sysfs attributes.
> This lets us support those attributes on tpm2 devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 4 --
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c | 125
10 matches
Mail list logo