On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:28:11PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> One stupid question. There is a number of branches:
> remotes/origin/master
> remotes/origin/tty-linus
> remotes/origin/tty-next
> remotes/origin/tty-testing
>
> What branch should I base my patches on? I used master.
Right
I've resent the 3 patches with version information.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> One stupid question. There is a number of branches:
> remotes/origin/master
> remotes/origin/tty-linus
> remotes/origin/tty-next
> remotes/origin/tty-testing
>
> What branch should
One stupid question. There is a number of branches:
remotes/origin/master
remotes/origin/tty-linus
remotes/origin/tty-next
remotes/origin/tty-testing
What branch should I base my patches on? I used master.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. It
Sorry for the delay. It is starred in my inbox and I plan to resend
the patches. Just did not have time yet.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> tty_buffer_flush frees not acquired buffers.
>> As the result, for example,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> tty_buffer_flush frees not acquired buffers.
> As the result, for example, read of b->size in tty_buffer_free
> can return garbage value which will lead to a huge buffer
> hanging in the freelist. This is just the benignest
> manifestation of
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:48:26PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> tty_buffer_flush frees not acquired buffers.
> As the result, for example, read of b->size in tty_buffer_free
> can return garbage value which will lead to a huge buffer
> hanging in the freelist. This is just the benignest
> manifest
6 matches
Mail list logo