On 2016-11-19 22:15, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Sat 19 Nov 12:30 PST 2016, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
On 2016-11-18 12:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>In the case where we fail to acquire the phy the hba priv will be set
>already, so during cleanup ufs_qcom_setup_clocks() will dereference the
>now free
On Sat 19 Nov 12:30 PST 2016, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
> On 2016-11-18 12:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >In the case where we fail to acquire the phy the hba priv will be set
> >already, so during cleanup ufs_qcom_setup_clocks() will dereference the
> >now free, but still "valid looking" pointer "ho
On 2016-11-18 12:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
In the case where we fail to acquire the phy the hba priv will be set
already, so during cleanup ufs_qcom_setup_clocks() will dereference the
now free, but still "valid looking" pointer "host".
host (ufs_qcom_host) was allocated with devm_kzalloc() so
3 matches
Mail list logo