On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> FWIW the ff tree has patches to allow "really early allocation" now.
> They could be used for this. I didn't implement that for i386 though,
> so that would still need some variant of your patch.
Just to clarify -The allocation failure currently happe
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 07:33:00PM -0500, Parag Warudkar wrote:
>
> People with HP Desktops (including me) encounter couple of DMI errors
> during boot - dmi_save_oem_strings_devices: out of memory and dmi_string:
> out of memory.
>
> On some HP desktops the DMI data include OEM strings (type 11)
* Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 12:06 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > * Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Here is the right one -
> > > 2.6.24-rc5 is without patch, 2.6.24-rc5-new is with patch.
> >
> > > DMI present.
> > > -dmi
* Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- 2.6.24-rc5-patched2007-12-19 07:21:05.0 -0500
> +++ 2.6.24-rc5-new2007-12-19 11:36:54.0 -0500
hm, i see no OOM messages in the diff - what am i missing?
best would be to run:
sort 2.6.24-rc5-patched > new.log
sort
On Dec 19, 2007 12:06 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here is the right one -
> > 2.6.24-rc5 is without patch, 2.6.24-rc5-new is with patch.
>
> > DMI present.
> > -dmi_save_oem_strings_devices: out of memory.
> > -dmi_string: out o
* Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is the right one -
> 2.6.24-rc5 is without patch, 2.6.24-rc5-new is with patch.
> DMI present.
> -dmi_save_oem_strings_devices: out of memory.
> -dmi_string: out of memory.
ok. I guess absent a real regression/bug reported by someone who gets
On Dec 19, 2007 11:54 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- 2.6.24-rc5-patched2007-12-19 07:21:05.0 -0500
> > +++ 2.6.24-rc5-new2007-12-19 11:36:54.0 -0500
>
> hm, i see no OOM messages in the diff - what am
On Dec 19, 2007 5:48 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ note: i had to manually fix up your patch because your email client
> added an extra space to every diff line - see
> Documentation/email-clients.txt on how to avoid that. I al
* Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People with HP Desktops (including me) encounter couple of DMI errors
> during boot - dmi_save_oem_strings_devices: out of memory and
> dmi_string: out of memory.
>
> On some HP desktops the DMI data include OEM strings (type 11) out of
> which onl
9 matches
Mail list logo