Re: [PATCH] x86: honor ACPI FADT flag indicating absence of a CMOS RTC

2013-10-18 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 18.10.13 at 08:29, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jan Beulich wrote: > > > >> We shouldn't be creating a corresponding platform device in that case. > > > > There's a sad lack of context in the changelog, how was it found, does > > this address any problem/bug observ

Re: [PATCH] x86: honor ACPI FADT flag indicating absence of a CMOS RTC

2013-10-18 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.10.13 at 08:29, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jan Beulich wrote: > >> We shouldn't be creating a corresponding platform device in that case. > > There's a sad lack of context in the changelog, how was it found, does > this address any problem/bug observed in practice, etc? This was a resul

Re: [PATCH] x86: honor ACPI FADT flag indicating absence of a CMOS RTC

2013-10-17 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jan Beulich wrote: > We shouldn't be creating a corresponding platform device in that case. There's a sad lack of context in the changelog, how was it found, does this address any problem/bug observed in practice, etc? > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > --- > arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c |5 +