On 08/27/2012 02:42 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:26:09PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Sure - sounds like a good idea. Further, a #define could eliminate
the need to change other references, but I'm not sure that's
GENERALLacceptable
#define mce_bios_cmci_threshold boot_f
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:26:09PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Sure - sounds like a good idea. Further, a #define could eliminate
> the need to change other references, but I'm not sure that's
> GENERALLacceptable
>
> #define mce_bios_cmci_threshold boot_flags.mce_bios_cmci_threshold
>
> could el
On 08/22/2012 06:16 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 06:00:54PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
The ACPI spec doesn't provide for a way for the bios to pass down
recommended thresholds to the OS on a _per-bank_ basis. This patch adds
a new boot option, which if passed, allows bios
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:38:05PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Sure - that sounds like a good idea. Further, a #define can be used to
> avoid the need to change other references, though I'm not sure it's
> considered good practice:
>
> #define mce_bios_cmci_threshold boot_flags.mce_bios_cmci_thre
On 08/22/2012 06:16 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 06:00:54PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
The ACPI spec doesn't provide for a way for the bios to pass down
recommended thresholds to the OS on a _per-bank_ basis. This patch adds
a new boot option, which if passed, allows bios
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 06:00:54PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> The ACPI spec doesn't provide for a way for the bios to pass down
> recommended thresholds to the OS on a _per-bank_ basis. This patch adds
> a new boot option, which if passed, allows bios to initialize the CMCI
> threshold. In such
6 matches
Mail list logo
