Hi!
> > > The patches in these series update the freezer to eliminate some existing
> > > shortcomings,
> >
> > argh.
> >
> > I have a backlog of maybe 300 patches here which I am cheerfully ignoring
> > while concentrating on preventing 2.6.23 from being less of a disaster than
> > it has alrea
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:30:54 -0500 "Josh Boyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/18/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > so please consider them as 2.6.23 material.
> >
> > The door for new 2.6.23 material shut two weeks ago. Here, at least.
>
> So do you have a general guideli
On 7/18/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so please consider them as 2.6.23 material.
The door for new 2.6.23 material shut two weeks ago. Here, at least.
So do you have a general guideline as to when you'd like patches sent
to you for the next merge window? The releases are fa
On Wednesday, 18 July 2007 10:03, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:29:30 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > The patches in these series update the freezer to eliminate some existing
> > shortcomings,
>
> argh.
>
> I have a backlog of maybe 300 patches here
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:29:30 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The patches in these series update the freezer to eliminate some existing
> shortcomings,
argh.
I have a backlog of maybe 300 patches here which I am cheerfully ignoring
while concentrating on preventing 2.6.23
Hi.
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 17:29:30 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The patches in these series update the freezer to eliminate some existing
> shortcomings, so please consider them as 2.6.23 material.
>
> The patches do the following:
> * update the freezer documentation to describe, prev
6 matches
Mail list logo
