Re: Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

(2013/12/24 17:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:27:45 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> (2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote: >>> Hi Masami, >>> >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2013

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:27:45 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote: >> Hi Masami, >> >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >>> (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

(2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Masami, > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri, Dec

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

(2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote: Hi Masami, On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:27:45 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote: Hi Masami, On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/21 3:03),

Re: Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

(2013/12/24 17:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:27:45 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote: Hi Masami, On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900,

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

Hi Masami, On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >>> (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

(2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: >> BTW, I'm not sure why debuginfo and nm shows symbol address +

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

(2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: BTW, I'm not sure why debuginfo and nm shows symbol address + 0x40,

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

Hi Masami, On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > BTW, I'm not sure why debuginfo and nm shows symbol address + 0x40, > and why the perf's map/symbol can

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

(2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: >> Use the actual address of tracepoint as a hint to find >> different local symbols. Since sometimes there are local >> symbols which have same name, it is impossible to

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

(2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: Use the actual address of tracepoint as a hint to find different local symbols. Since sometimes there are local symbols which have same name, it is impossible to determine

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: BTW, I'm not sure why debuginfo and nm shows symbol address + 0x40, and why the perf's map/symbol can remove

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > Use the actual address of tracepoint as a hint to find > different local symbols. Since sometimes there are local > symbols which have same name, it is impossible to determine > which symbol should be used. This saves the

Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] perf-probe: Use the actual address as a hint for uprobes

Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: Use the actual address of tracepoint as a hint to find different local symbols. Since sometimes there are local symbols which have same name, it is impossible to determine which symbol should be used. This saves the actual