Re: [PATCH v3] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark

On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 18:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > +struct timeval start, end, total; > > +static unsigned int start_nr = 100; > > +static unsigned int end_nr = 1100; > > +static unsigned int increment_by = 100; > > +static int bench_dur = NOTSET; > > +static int num_jobs = NOTS

Re: [PATCH v3] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 14:54 -0800, Tuan Bui wrote: > [root@u64 ~]# perf bench locking vfs > # Running 'locking/vfs' benchmark: > >100 processes: throughput = 342506 average opts/sec all processes >100 processes: throughput = 3425 average opts/sec per process > >200 processes: throughp

Re: [PATCH v3] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark

Em Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 02:54:53PM -0800, Tuan Bui escreveu: > Subject: [PATCH] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark > > In response to this thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/11/93, this is > a micro benchmark that stresses locking contention in the kernel with > creat(2) system call by spawning m

Re: [PATCH v3] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark

* Tuan Bui wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/m