On 03/21/2015 07:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 16:12:30 -0700
Yes, agreed. It is on the to-do list. Should we be more aggressive ?
Since I'll have to resubmit anyway, we could start by adding defines
for all constants used in this patch set, not just som
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 16:12:30 -0700
> Yes, agreed. It is on the to-do list. Should we be more aggressive ?
> Since I'll have to resubmit anyway, we could start by adding defines
> for all constants used in this patch set, not just some of them.
As long as you'll really take
> >But this driver would be so much easier to read and understand if it
> >used mnemonics instead of constants for the register offsets.
> >
>
> Yes, agreed. It is on the to-do list. Should we be more aggressive ?
> Since I'll have to resubmit anyway, we could start by adding defines
> for all con
On 03/21/2015 03:48 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:46:37 -0700
Patch 1 to 7 of this series prepare the drivers using the mv88e6xxx code
for HW bridging support, without adding the code itself. For the most part
this factors out common port initialization
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:46:37 -0700
> Patch 1 to 7 of this series prepare the drivers using the mv88e6xxx code
> for HW bridging support, without adding the code itself. For the most part
> this factors out common port initialization code. There is no functional
> change exc
5 matches
Mail list logo
