On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:56:31 -0500
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 02:27:23 -0300, Lucas De Marchi said:
>
> > These patches are not intended for merging as is... clearly we have at least
> > one problem: fram's minor is clashing with logibm's. I don't know what to do
> > her
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 02:27:23 -0300, Lucas De Marchi said:
> These patches are not intended for merging as is... clearly we have at least
> one problem: fram's minor is clashing with logibm's. I don't know what to do
> here.
They both look like obscure devices to me. Are there any architectures wh
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:27:23AM -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: Lucas De Marchi
>
> These patches are not intended for merging as is... clearly we have at least
> one problem: fram's minor is clashing with logibm's. I don't know what to do
> here.
>
> The first patch also adds comments
3 matches
Mail list logo